jump to navigation

Bourgeois Reaction to the Digital Revolution February 25, 2011

Posted by Summerspeaker in Technology, The Singularity, Transhumanism.
trackback

In You Are Not a Gadget, Jaron Lanier invokes totalitarian collectivism in order to discredit contemporary internet culture and the transhumanist movement. While the book contains a worthwhile critique of the corporations and software developers pulling the strings, Lanier conceives of the problem as a threat to middle-class privilege. The social shift toward free content erodes the position of people such as Lanier who’ve had success selling their ideas in the marketplace.

Ey employs conventional conservative appeals to make this case, most notably in repeatedly describing the horror of the crowd or mob. Great dudes like Einstein drive history, not the ignorant and unruly masses. Those plebeians are running wild in the tubes and disturbing respectable folks! Lanier’s rhetoric here comes out of a long elitist and specifically anti-radical tradition; ey goes so far as to channel Winston Churchill in a Wall Street Journal piece. Eir defense of intellectual property laws serves the interests of eir class under the current circumstances but harms the species as a whole.

This ideology worries me every bit as much as Ray Kurzweil’s – at least Singularitarianism allows for the possibility of a post-scarcity economy and thus an effective end to capitalism. Lanier longs for perpetual competition, hierarchy, and want. I’d rather have a benevolent robot overlord.  Thankfully, options exists outside of the status quo. A society based on liberty, equality, and abundance will foster individual fulfillment and expression in a way Lanier’s unimaginative centrism never can. The fact that our current direction worries em gives me hope for the future.

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Ulrik F. Thyve - March 18, 2011

“I’m not sure I have any valid arguments other than labeling something bourgeois, lets hope noone notices”…?

The fact that internet opens up creation, remix culture and sharing of ideas has if nothing else shown that 99% of the users are sheeple.

2. Summerspeaker - March 18, 2011

Seems like enough of an argument to me. If you don’t want egalitarian social revolution but instead just desire nice things for creative professionals, then go with Lanier’s program. Though I would suggest the CEPR intellectual property reforms over what ey proposes.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: